|
|
A Weblog of Centrist Voices in American Politics |
|
October 29, 2003Where is the Middle?We've been discussing the war in Iraq at some length here today. I think it boils down to this. The left and right essentially own this debate now. The nine Democratic presidential candidates are caught up in an anti-war and conflict-minimizing rhetoric. It's very clear the activists in the party feel that way, so everyone feels pressured to combine angry anti-war rhetoric with various views of how we can minimize our contribution either in manpower or money. We centrists just don't have a big presence among Democratic primary voters. Meanwhile, on the right, it's pretty close to "the president is good and right about everything". The right side of the blogosphere is dominated with that theme, minus some sane folks like Drezner and Tacitus. Where is the middle? The middle, to me, is a recognition that we are strongly committed to Iraq, that we have to succeed for reasons of our own well-being (winning the war on terror), as well as meeting our obligations as an occupying power. The middle isn't shy about sending men and money. And, more importantly, discussing strategy alternatives. The middle is represented in those informed policy debates we see on the PBS News Hour, or, in abbreviated forms, on other news networks. The middle shows up when experts discuss options, not when partisans debate "the two sides" of this issue. We talk about things like training more Iraqi police, or, as Col. Patrick Lang suggested the other night, bringing back a couple of carefully screened divisions of the Iraqi army. How about deploying more intelligence resources to help us focus in on the Iraqi resistance? Take half the guys who are currently looking for WMD in Iraq and put them on the trail of Baathists and suicide bombers. None of these "ideas" or "options" make their way onto the stage at the Democratic debates. Nor do they squeeze in, somehow, among those who spend most of their time passionately defending the president. Notice that we don't have a candidate in 2004 who represents these options -- strong and serious commitment to Iraq, combined with a broad and realistic assessment of our options there. Any such candidate, if he exists, is not getting the support of the party faithful, and will therefore not win his party's nomination. So, yes, the left and right own this debate. Anger on one side, and loyalty on the other, are the dominating factors. Posted by William Swann at October 29, 2003 03:47 PMComments
As centrists, we're less inclined to spin, because we have trouble deciding on the direction of the rotation. We can try to get beyond the "Bush lied, People died" sloganeering without endorsing the president's policies. I'm still trying to figure out what happened with the WMD's. I was perusing the Norwegian blogger Bjorn Staerk and he cited this Seymour Hersch essay called The Stovepipe It's a must read. Hersh in controversial, but seems to have sources inside the CIA who are leaking to him, trying to cast the blame for the intelligence failure on the Administration. Specifically, he says the Administration bypassed the CIA analysts and had demanded to see the raw data, much of which was misleading, as experienced analysts would know. For instance,
Posted by: rickheller at October 29, 2003 05:23 PM |
Archives
March 2006
February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003 May 2003 April 2003
Recent Entries
Dubai Out
Why So Long Between Democracies? Round One, Centrism Rock Lobster? Blackwell Releases "Worst-Treated" List "IRV" used in Burl., VT for mayor election. Great idea! Random Thread Election 2006: Round One A Proper Multiculturalism Bush proposes line item veto act - what's changed?
|